Most software projects go wrong in the same two places: nobody agreed what was being built, and nobody saw it until it was finished. This is arranged so neither can happen.
There is no discovery phase you pay for before you know what you are getting.
Half an hour. You describe the part of the week that should not still be manual. We ask about the systems involved and who touches what. You get an honest view of whether it is worth building, including when it is not.
What gets built, what it costs, how long it takes, what it connects to, and what is deliberately not included. A fixed price, not an estimate that drifts. You read it before anything is agreed and you owe nothing if you walk away.
Small releases you can actually use, not one delivery at the end. You see it working early enough to change your mind while changing it is still cheap. Nothing goes near your live system until it has been proved somewhere safe.
The code, the documentation and the accounts are in your name. Support afterwards if you want it, on terms agreed in writing, and nothing stops working if you do not.
So these are not preferences. They are how the work is done, on every engagement.
HEYGUS is one accountable engineer working with AI development tooling. There is no account manager between you and the work, no internal handover, and no requirement that gets lost on its way from the person who heard it to the person building it.
That is faster and considerably cheaper than an agency team, and it is how a growing number of professional software companies now build. It also means the person quoting the work is the person who has to deliver it, which tends to keep quotes honest.
It is a small operation and we take a small number of engagements at a time. If we cannot start when you need us, you will be told that on the first call rather than after you have signed something. Everything is documented as it is built and the accounts are in your name, so you are never dependent on us being available.
A fixed price, quoted after a written scope. We do not give a number before we understand the systems involved, because any number given at that stage is a guess, and guesses get corrected upwards later. The scope and the price come before you commit to anything.
The scope says so before you agree to it. Work goes out in small releases rather than one delivery at the end, so you see something working early and can change direction while it is still cheap to do.
Yes. The code, the documentation and the accounts are yours, in your name. There is no licence to keep paying and nothing stops working if you stop working with us.
No. Work happens in a staging environment, and if one does not exist then building one is the first task. Nothing touches live customer data, bookings or billing until it has been tested somewhere it cannot do harm.
Usually not. Most of the work is making what you already own talk to itself. Replacing a working system is expensive, disruptive, and rarely the actual problem.
Then that is what you will be told on the call. Some problems are a process problem, or a training problem, or a setting that nobody ever switched on. Selling you a build in those cases would be easy and wrong.
Half an hour. Describe the bit of your week that should not still be manual, and we will tell you honestly whether it is worth building.
Book a call →No sales deck, no obligation, and a straight answer either way.